Thursday, March 13, 2008

Who do we need?

Cr Sue Brooks is again in trouble with the Chronicle's editorial (page 8, March 12) taking her to task over alleged conflict of interest, and a further editorial comment following her Letter to the Editor in today's (March 13) edition on the same subject.
Her crime? Voting against a motion to give council staff the power to make the decisions on a proposed planning application to extend the Bay Central (sic) complex. 

According to the editor's comment, four sitting councillors felt Cr Brooks had a conflict of interest in slowing down the application process because her partner owns a business in the complex. 

It is drawing a very long bow to claim her vote against handing over councillor's decision-making responsibilities on such an important planning issue, was a conflict of interest. If the four councillors were happy to devolve their responsibilities to unelected council officers then it begs the question: do we need them? Those councillors who do not want to take on the responsibility of decision making should do us all a favour and withdraw.

The last word belongs to the Chronicle cartoon Quick Draw (Page 8 March 12). The koala is holding what looks like a Rubik's Cube with a tag saying "The latest puzzle for people who live in glass houses." The koala says "I'm surprised that some councillors have started promoting this new "Conflict of Interest" puzzle - I wonder what's in it for them."  

No comments: